hofstede cultural dimensions masculinity vs femininity hofstede cultural dimensions masculinity vs femininity

Specifically, we have seen that Ingleharts dynamic theory, which has been criticized for a reductionist dimensionality, applies to the multidimensional framework of Hofstede who has been criticized for a stationary concept of culture. Masculinity The Masculinity/Femininity dimension is about what values are considered more important in a society. 17.In addition to GDP per capita, we have explored a broader indicator of welfare. Hence, Individualism embodies a strong anti-authoritarian impulse that aligns naturally with Power Distance. Developing societies (N = 12; Nrespondents = 74,071) include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Iran, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Sparked by Jared Diamonds (1997) epic Guns, Germs and Steel, this literature (for an overview, see Spolaore & Wacziarg, 2009) focuses on historically remote factors at the origin of long-lasting, highly inert country trajectories that stretch well into the present. This is obvious from the fact that the upward-sloping cohort patterns in Individualism and Joy remain basically unchanged and run closely parallel throughout the two points in time. Consistent with our theory, we expect country scores on CollectivismIndividualism and DutyJoy to increase over time. He constructed his culture framework from data collected in attitudinal surveys conducted in subsidiaries of IBM in 72 countries between 1968 and 1973 (reduced to 40 countries after the criterion of at least 50 respondents was applied). The Dutch management researcher, Geert Hofstede, created the cultural dimensions theory in 1980 (Hofstede, 1980). Hofstede himself initially labeled this dimension Individualism-Company orientation, but chose to use the Collectivism pole instead. The most common dimension used for ordering societies is their degree of economic evolution or modernity. sexuality equality, environmental awareness, and more fluid gender 9.All codebooks and data are available from the website of the WVS, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org, or EVS, http://europeanvaluesstudy.eu. Using a variety of indicators, Hamamura (2012) not only reports a shift toward individualism in the United States and Japan but also highlights the persistent cultural heritage in these two countries, a finding in line with Ingleharts revised modernization thesis. A one-dimensional ordering of societies from traditional to modern fitted well with the nineteenth- and . Table A3 in the online appendix provides all measurement details of the selected items.10 The correlational wave-averaged analysis yields a set of 15 items that fulfill all of the above criteria, that is, considerable country coverage, multiple wave coverage, attitude-based, and significantly correlated with country scores on the four original Hofstede dimensions or included to calculate country scores in the fifth and sixth dimension. What is femininity according to Hofstede? This study encompassed over 100,000 employees from 50 countries across three regions. We also observe a change in the direction of less trust and more distrust, but these changes are relatively small compared with the cultural change observed for Individualism and Joy. With the above limitation in mind, our main findings regarding cultural change can be summarized as follows: It needs to be emphasized that our analyses have been conducted at the group level, which is the level at which culture operates in shaping the norms and beliefs of individuals. 1.The first (and only) time Ronald Inglehart and Geert Hofstede met face to face was at a conference organized by the European Values Studies (EVS) team at Tilburg University, the Netherlands, in 2002. The essentials of scholarship: A reply to Geert Hofstede. As the results on cultural change are only reliable when the found dimensions are reliable, the first part of this article is dedicated to establish reliable dimensions of national culture. Cultural change for CollectivismIndividualism. There is a certain degree of inequality in all societies, notes Hofstede; however, there is relatively more equality in some societies than in others. Using the Trust label for this dimension resonates well with the vast literature on trust in economics (e.g., Zak & Knack, 2001), political science (e.g., Fukuyama, 1995; Putnam, 1993, 2000), and sociology (e.g., Delhey & Newton, 2005). All items fit Hofstedes description of the Uncertainty Avoidance dimension well. We split the latter group in former Soviet Union (N = 9) and former Soviet Satellites (N = 15). (2007). Using the results of the unbalanced panel (Models 3, 6, and 9), a comparison of GDP per capita in Cohort 5 between the United States and Thailand (the sample average) shows that the higher level of economic development in the United States is associated with a 5-point difference in CollectivismIndividualism (the United States is 5 points higher), and a 14-point difference in DutyJoy (the United States is 14 points higher). This particular finding is not surprising because the Individualism versus Collectivism dimension can be found in all cultural frameworks (i.e., Hofstede, Schwartz, Globe, Welzel). Human Relations, 55( 11), 1363-1372. Flanagan (1987) argued early on that Ingleharts narrow concept of postmaterialism presses into single dimension things that are in fact dimensionally distinct: namely, postauthoritarian liberalism and postmaterial idealism (see also Welzel, 2007). Economic development and generational shifts account for approximately half of the variation in cultural change. South Africa scores 49 on this dimension and thus has a low preference for avoiding uncertainty. Legal. The second dimension includes all three items used by Hofstede when measuring IVR, and one of the three items when measuring LTO. This logical link underlies the close empirical connection. . Accordingly, these residuals reflect more remote determinants of country trajectories, such as precolonial factor endowments and colonial legacies. Society at large is more competitive. The other 50% is explained by country-fixed effects. ERIC - EJ1328766 - Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions in Relation to According to Hofstede (1997: 161), the resulting Chinese Values Survey overlapped with three of Hofstedes dimensions: power distance, individualism, and masculinity although not with the uncertainty avoidance dimension. In addition, we find that the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) model fit is best in a three-factor model.11 Masculinity vs. Femininity When it comes to this dimension, the question is whether the emphasis is on the status, achievement and success in life or the quality of life, serving others and the protection of the environment and nature are the priorities of the given country. This article describes briefly the Hofstede's four dimensions of national cultures: Power Distance, Individualism vs. Collectivism, Masculinity vs. Femininity and Uncertainty Avoidance and describes Turkey in terms of these dimensions. Former Soviet Satellites (N = 9; Nrespondents = 51,008) include Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Note: Unless otherwise indicated (ns), all correlation and regression coefficients are significant at p < .05. Although there are many models of cultural dimensions, Hofstede's model has been selected for this study because of its relatively high popularity. Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions - Understanding Different Countries The minimum number of respondents per country in each birth cohort is 100. By contrast, if one lets the data decide if the 20 items cohere in two clearly distinct dimensions, the answer is a resounding No: There is just one dimension, which is mostly due to the fact that the traditional end in Traditional versus Secular-rational Values and the survival end in Survival versus Self-expression Values are highly convergent (Li & Bond, 2010). As a conclusion, the students are more femininity oriented, even though there are several answers that characterize a masculine culture Regarding favour , 55,6 . As cohort replacement happens at a glacial pace (especially in the face of rising life expectancies), the upward shift is modest. Kirkman et al. ambition, acquisition of wealth, and differentiated gender roles. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Since then, it's become an internationally recognized standard for understanding cultural differences. Ranking of 40 countries from most to least indulgent (reproduced from Jandt, 2016: 175). Within a business, Hofstedes framework can also help managers to understand why their employees behave the way they do. An alternative definition of generations relies on shared historical and political experiences (Bengtson, 1975; Parry & Urwin, 2011; Strauss & Howe, 1991). Virtual programme Cross-Cultural Management, The Multi-Focus Model on Organisational Culture. This dimension focuses on how extent to which a society stress achievement or nurture. Hofstede distinguishes between Individualism and Power Distance because they are conceptually distinct (Hofstede, 1980, p. 62).5 Empirically, however, they are part of one dimension and represent the two ends of one dimension. Masculinity is seen to be the trait which emphasizes Trust and confidence levels are rather high among people born before 1940, but decrease for younger generations. The items in our analysis represent these aspects of Uncertainty Avoidance. Long-term orientation is associated with thrift, savings, persistence toward results, and the willingness to subordinate oneself for a purpose. A factor analysis including the pride-in-nation question in the first or third dimension indicates a separate and unique loading of the pride-in-nation question. That is to say; this dimension is a measure of societal impulse and desire control. Note: Correlations are at the country level, N = 63; see Table 2 for full explanation of items. Triandis H. C., Bontempo R., Villareal M. J., Asai M., Lucca N. (1988). This dimension describes how every society has to maintain some links with its own past while dealing with the challenges of the present and future, and societies prioritise these two existential goals differently. The time period is 1981-2014, including individuals born between 1900 and 1999 covering one century of formative years in our analysis of intergenerational value shifts. What is Hofstede Cultural Dimensions masculinity vs femininity? Hofstedes dimensions have been found to correlate with a variety of other country difference variables, including: For example, countries that share a border tend to have more similarities in culture than those that are further apart. Moreover, as people in postindustrial societies are used to handle complex situations, to deal with abstract constructs and to cope with social diversity, their moral reasoning capacity and empathy expand (Flynn, 2012; Pinker, 2011). We summarize the criticism raised in the context of their theories. By estimating a fixed-effects model, we control for all other possible characteristics of countries such as their unique country-specific history (including ex-communism) and geography (e.g., climatic conditions). The long-term and short-term orientation dimension refers to the degree to which cultures encourage delaying gratification or the material, social, and emotional needs of their members (Hofstede, 1980). Power Distance is defined as the extent to which the less powerful members of institutions and organisations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. Long Term vs. Short-Term Orientation China Indulgence Power Distance Index Power Distance Index achievement This depiction is a most serious misinterpretation. Countries scoring high on Long-Term Orientation tend to be more future-oriented and easily accept delayed gratification of individual effort. Theorists of globalization advocate a universalistic view due to which modernitys isomorphic tendencies drive an increasing convergence of human values (Bell, 1973; Inkeles & Smith, 1974). We apply a variety of psychometric techniques commonly used in cross-cultural psychology and comparative sociology. Beugelsdijk S., De Groot H. L. F., van Schaik T. (2004). Psychological review, 98(2), 224. This dimension is defined as the extent to which people try to control their desires and impulses, based on the way they were raised. A recent replication of the Uncertainty Avoidance dimension using data from the European Social Survey highlights the relevance of anxiety and stress (Minkov & Hofstede, 2014). 3.We put in parentheses terminology that Hofstede himself did not use. National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations, Generational difference: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium, Research note: Hofstedes consequences, a study of reviews, citations and consequences, Generations: The history of Americas future, 15842089, Examining the impact of cultures consequences: A three-decade, multi-level, meta-analytic review of Hofstedes cultural value dimensions, Improving national cultural indices using a longitudinal meta-analysis of Hofstedes dimensions, The next America: Boomers, millennials, and the looming generational showdown, No evidence that an Ebola outbreak influenced voting preferences in the 2014 elections after controlling for time-series autocorrelation: A commentary on Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016), A theory of individualism and collectivism, Handbook of theories of social psychology, Individualism-Collectivism and personality. Yet, even if the prevailing pattern were a uniform progressive trend in values, there are still three distinct possibilities as concerns cultural convergence/divergence, depending on the speed by which countries move: (a) countries move in the same direction at the same speed, in which case their absolute distances remain constant7; (b) the top scoring countries move faster in the same direction than the low-scoring ones, in which case the absolute distances grow (i.e., the case of cultural divergence); and (c) the low-scoring countries catch up and move faster in the same direction than the top scoring ones, in which case the absolute distances shrink (i.e., the case of cultural convergence). The answer to this question is obvious to us, as it seems self-evident that Collectivism and Duty are more adaptive to existential pressures, while the opposite valuesIndividualism and Joyare adaptive to existential opportunities (Varnum & Grossmann, 2017). How do you get the chest in the foundry in Darksiders 2. Masculine vs. Feminine Cultures: Distinctions - Study.com Later, researchers added restraint vs. indulgence to this list. The STATA command we use is xtreg depvar indpvars, fe, cluster(country). The alternative is to apply a DriscollKraay estimator (the xtscc command in STATA), but this results in smaller standard errors and larger t values. Moreover, and more important in our context, the 20 items used to generate the two dimensions on the InglehartWelzel world map of cultures only generate two dimensions when one actively enforces the extraction of exactly two dimensions (Welzel, 2013). This means that there is no supporting time-trend effect in Individualism and Joy, so that cohort replacement alone shifted the mean upward. The fundamental issue addressed by this dimension is the degree of interdependence a society maintains among its members. Smith P. B., Dugan S., Trompenaars F. (1996). or nurture. South Africa scores 63 on this dimension and is thus a Masculine society. Humans have evolved as a social species and all their achievements derive from coordinated teamwork. So these two cultures share, in terms of masculinity, similar values. They possess a positive attitude and have a tendency towards optimism. Note: For reason explained in the main text, Items 9 and 12 are dropped in the final calculation of the replicated dimensions. Trust and economic growth: A robustness analysis. Hofstede's first large study included data from over 70 countries. The standard procedure to select respondents is a form of random probability sampling, although the details vary due to each countrys territorial and demographic specifics. In collectivistic cultures, a particularistic form of solidarity with ones extended family prevails. While the country scores for the four original dimensions are derived from surveys conducted at IBM, the scores for the latter two dimensions are calculated from data of the WVS. Indeed, many of the conclusions are based on a small number of responses. Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.org. Data on all birth cohorts covering the entire 20th century is available for 21 countries. Hofstede vs trompenaars. Trompenaars vs. Hofstede 2022-10-28 Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The first author thanks the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) for their financial support (VIDI-452-11-010), ORCID iD: Chris Welzel A cluster analysis for 86 countries on the basis of our dimensions is in line with intuition and previous clustering attempts (Ronen & Shenkar, 2013), thus increasing the credibility of these newly created dimensions (see the online appendix). We find that the dimensions correlate high with the original Hofstede dimensions, and low with one another (see Table A5 in the online appendix). The reason why these additional questions are excluded from the new dimensions is their limited availability across waves and/or countries. The relationship between cultural characteristics and preference for active vs. This question concerns the degree to which the respondent agrees that a wife must always obey her husband. the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health. Communication Accommodation Theory and Hofstede's Dimensions of As both the question on national pride as well as the question on service to others are part of the WVS-based long-term orientation dimension (see Table A1 in the online appendix), our decision to exclude those two questions implies to retain only one item included in Hofstede et al.s (2010) long-term orientation dimension. Pairwise Correlations Between 15 WVS-EVS Items and Hofstedes Dimensions (p < .05). This dimension reflects the extent to which members of a society attempt to cope with their anxiety by minimizing uncertainty. Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? Since its inclusion as a standard module in the European Social Survey, the Schwartz Value Inventory has become the most widely recognized concept of values in psychology. Finally, a replication of Hofstedes study, conducted across 93 separate countries, confirmed the existence of the five dimensions and identified a sixth known as indulgence and restraint (Hofstede & Minkov, 2010). For this reason, the psychological power of culture is most visible in the aggregate, that is, in how it shapes entire societies overall orientation. Hofstede (1980) originally provided country scores for four dimensions of national culture: Power Distance (vs. Closeness),3 Uncertainty Avoidance (vs. We find three items, of which the first two capture the confidence that people have in political parties and the justice system. Interestingly, whereas higher scores on trust have been shown to have a positive effect on economic development (Beugelsdijk, De Groot, & van Schaik, 2004; Beugelsdijk & van Schaik, 2005), our cohort analysis shows that over time generations have moved in the direction toward distrust. The younger siblings had to leave home and make their own living with their core families. As country specificities in CollectivismIndividualism and DutyJoy are positively correlated with each other, most historic drivers correlate in the same direction with country specificities in both cultural dimensions, albeit usually at a considerably higher magnitude in the CollectivismIndividualism dimension compared to the DutyJoy dimension. Countries in italics are used in the first cohort (N = 15; Nrespondents = 108,064). This is especially relevant to the former Soviet Union and some Eastern European countries. According to the following quote from Hofstede's cultural dimensions model "At 66 China is a Masculine society -success oriented and driven. By imputing scores for these single items in these 16 countries, we are able to generate scores on all three dimensions for 102 countries (vs. 86 countries). Opinions expressed by the author are not necessarily those of WITI. This dimension deals with the fact that all individuals in societies are not equal it expresses the attitude of the culture towards these inequalities amongst us. We estimate three models, one for each cultural dimension. Countries that score low on this third dimension are generally on the right end of the political scale, and feel that democracies are indecisive. According to the evolutionary theory of emancipation, national populations subjective life orientations vary on a continuum from a preventive closure mentality, in which people emphasize uniformity, discipline, hierarchy, and authority, toward a promotive openness mentality, in which they emphasize the opposite traits, namely, diversity, creativity, liberty, and autonomy. Hofstedes cultural dimensions are widely used to understand etiquette and facilitate communication across cultures in areas ranging from business to diplomacy. The evolutionary logic in the works of Inglehart and Welzel predicts a generational shift from orientations dominant under pressing existential threats (i.e., survival orientations) toward orientations dominant under abundant existential opportunities (i.e., emancipative orientations)to the extent to which socioeconomic development indeed changed objective living conditions that way. The four original dimensions identified in Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory are power distance, individualism vs. collectivism, masculinity vs. femininity, and uncertainty avoidance. The LTO dimension was uncovered in a study by the Chinese Culture Connection (1987) project, which sought to remedy the potential Western bias in the original IBM survey by running a separate survey designed by an independent team of Asian researchers (Hofstede & Bond, 1988). South Africa scores 49 on this dimension which means that people to a larger extent accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification. Its alpha equals .77. The writings in sociology and political science on cultural change are dominated by modernization theory, predicting that continued economic development goes together with predictable changes in norms, values, and beliefs (Bell, 1973; Flanagan, 1987; Inglehart, 1971, 1990, 1997; Inkeles, 1960; Inkeles & Smith, 1974; McClelland, 1961; Nash, 1964; Welzel, 2013). Rising IQ in the twenty-first century, Assessing construct validity in organizational research, Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. A research note: The unfinished business of culture, Generation and family effects in value socialization, A note on the theory and measurement of trust in explaining differences in economic growth. Masculine traits include assertiveness, materialism/material success, self-centeredness, power, strength, and individual achievements. This leads us to drop the item pride-in-nation from our analysis. The horizontal axis depicts the score on the CollectivismIndividualism dimension for the first survey wave. Although highly influential, Hofstedes and Ingleharts works have been heavily criticized. In fact, Welzel (2013) even shows evidence for divergence, as those countries having been ahead in matters of emancipation already decades ago moved even faster toward more emancipation, Scandinavia and Sweden being the clearest cases in point. This dimension focuses on how extent to which a society stress They tend to belong to fewer groups but are defined more by their membership in them. The fundamental issue here is what motivates people, wanting to be the best (Masculine) or liking what you do (Feminine).